[Gate-users] Issues on voxelized dose calculations for a phantom

[Alex Vergara Gil]

Dear All

I have created an Issue on github for this thread where I explain my
problems (and my findings).

Regards
Alex

2015-05-04 12:11 GMT-04:00, Alex Vergara Gil <alexvergaragil at gmail.com>:
> Dear All
>
> I have seen three files
>
> GateVImageVolume
> GateGeometryVoxelRangeTranslator
> GateGeometryVoxelTabulatedTranslator
>
> with the same ReadTranslationTable procedure. Is this intended? Is
> there an intention to put this procedure in the last two classes?
> There is currently no relation between these three classes more than
> the last two inherits from the same class. What is the intention in
> this case? It affects how a translation table is read and passed to
> G4.
>
> Regards
> Alex
>
> 2015-04-30 11:26 GMT-04:00, Alex Vergara Gil <alexvergaragil at gmail.com>:
>> Dear all
>>
>> I think I have found a posible bug related to my issue (possible wrong
>> material handler in voxelized range translator, giving bad density
>> values and therefore bad dose calculations). In the file
>> GateGeometryVoxelRangeTranslator.cc, specifically in the function
>>
>> G4String GateGeometryVoxelRangeTranslator::GetNextMaterial(G4bool
>> doReset)
>> {
>>   static GateVoxelMaterialTranslationRangeVector::iterator anIterator
>> = m_voxelMaterialTranslation.begin();
>>
>>   if (doReset)
>>     anIterator = m_voxelMaterialTranslation.begin();
>>
>>   G4String aMaterial = ( anIterator!=m_voxelMaterialTranslation.end()
>> ) ? anIterator->second : G4String("") ;
>>   if (aMaterial!="")
>>     anIterator++;
>>
>>   return aMaterial;
>> }
>>
>> Here you may see that the iterator is initialized every time the
>> function is called, I think it is better to put the iterator as a
>> variable, but you know better than me, so please could you explain why
>> it is used a static iterator here?
>>
>> Regards
>> Alex
>>
>>
>> 2015-04-30 8:07 GMT-04:00, Kiran Joshi <kiran.j88 at gmail.com>:
>>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 at 13:01 Alex Vergara Gil <alexvergaragil at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear all
>>>>
>>>> Attached I explain my problems.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Alex
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gate-users mailing list
>>>> Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
>>>> http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
>>>
>>
>