[Gate-users] Gate-users Digest, Vol 86, Issue 26
Toninho Antonio
acbertolo at gmail.com
Tue Jul 30 20:32:35 CEST 2013
Did you use the generic repeater and was generated Coincidences?
Could you share the details about the gate code to work?
Our Gate version is gate v6.1
2013/7/30 <gate-users-request at lists.opengatecollaboration.org>
> Send Gate-users mailing list submissions to
> gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> gate-users-request at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> gate-users-owner at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Gate-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Coincidences with generic repeater (Fernando Rannou)
> 2. Re: Coincidences with generic repeater (Leo Read)
> 3. Re: Coincidences with generic repeater (Fernando Rannou)
> 4. Re: Coincidences with generic repeater (Leo Read)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:58:43 -0400
> From: Fernando Rannou <fernando.rannou at usach.cl>
> To: Leo Read <leoread at gmail.com>
> Cc: "gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org"
> <gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org>, Toninho Antonio
> <acbertolo at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Gate-users] Coincidences with generic repeater
> Message-ID:
> <CAN3A8B0EuD=RF_FKKmiVMFSMmDiNaGVrRFVsbYg=
> mS_60p6pTA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Please specify with version of gate you are having this problem.
> I use repeaters and CYlindricalPET in 6.1 and I get coincidences
>
>
> Fernando
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Leo Read <leoread at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Antonio,
> >
> > I have also noticed that coincidences are not generated when the generic
> > repeater is used. I did not find any solution to this on the forum.
> >
> > As a result, I'm writing C code to generating coincidence data based on
> > hits data in the root output. I have personally found that I don't like
> how
> > Gate generates singles output based on the hits output - it doesn't seem
> to
> > handle inter-crystal events properly. If you are OK with ignoring this
> > effect, then you may want to look into looping over the singles data and
> > generating your own coincidence data.
> >
> > If anybody has an alternative solution, please share your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Toninho Antonio <acbertolo at gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >>
> >> We are looking to simulate PET systems and when we used the generic
> >> repeater to replicate the rsectors, using PETScanner or CYlindricalPET,
> the
> >> coincidences was not generated. Besides that when we kept the same
> >> digitizer and used the ring repeater the coincidences were generated
> >> correctly.
> >>
> >> Does anyone used the generic repeater and was able get the coincidences?
> >> Is it necessary any specific modifications on digitizer?
> >>
> >> The Singles are generated in both cases. We tried with two PET system at
> >> GATE to test whether the generic repeater was to be used specifically to
> >> PETScanner.
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Gate-users mailing list
> >> Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
> >> http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gate-users mailing list
> > Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
> > http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/private/gate-users/attachments/20130730/c189a5a6/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:00:50 -0400
> From: Leo Read <leoread at gmail.com>
> To: Fernando Rannou <fernando.rannou at usach.cl>
> Cc: "gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org"
> <gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org>, Toninho Antonio
> <acbertolo at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Gate-users] Coincidences with generic repeater
> Message-ID:
> <CAAZkGQ=+
> cooxiRLj4cpG4JppnsbDCXLkGqDGuEP0dNFHOfkxTg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I used PETscanner + gate v6.2 and did not get coincidences with generic
> repeater.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Fernando Rannou
> <fernando.rannou at usach.cl>wrote:
>
> > Please specify with version of gate you are having this problem.
> > I use repeaters and CYlindricalPET in 6.1 and I get coincidences
> >
> >
> > Fernando
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Leo Read <leoread at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Antonio,
> >>
> >> I have also noticed that coincidences are not generated when the generic
> >> repeater is used. I did not find any solution to this on the forum.
> >>
> >> As a result, I'm writing C code to generating coincidence data based on
> >> hits data in the root output. I have personally found that I don't like
> how
> >> Gate generates singles output based on the hits output - it doesn't
> seem to
> >> handle inter-crystal events properly. If you are OK with ignoring this
> >> effect, then you may want to look into looping over the singles data and
> >> generating your own coincidence data.
> >>
> >> If anybody has an alternative solution, please share your thoughts.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Toninho Antonio <acbertolo at gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> We are looking to simulate PET systems and when we used the generic
> >>> repeater to replicate the rsectors, using PETScanner or CYlindricalPET,
> >>> the coincidences was not generated. Besides that when we kept the same
> >>> digitizer and used the ring repeater the coincidences were generated
> >>> correctly.
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone used the generic repeater and was able get the
> coincidences?
> >>> Is it necessary any specific modifications on digitizer?
> >>>
> >>> The Singles are generated in both cases. We tried with two PET system
> at
> >>> GATE to test whether the generic repeater was to be used specifically
> to
> >>> PETScanner.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Gate-users mailing list
> >>> Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
> >>> http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Gate-users mailing list
> >> Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
> >> http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
> >>
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/private/gate-users/attachments/20130730/fe6f6da7/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:05:18 -0400
> From: Fernando Rannou <fernando.rannou at usach.cl>
> To: Leo Read <leoread at gmail.com>,
> "<gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org>"
> <gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org>
> Subject: Re: [Gate-users] Coincidences with generic repeater
> Message-ID:
> <CAN3A8B2ozL_h5Yys0meQ5eu_ZZ-u2zh6YMDMV5tnTcB+OmdS=
> w at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi Leo
>
>
> PETScanner is a new addition to Gate systems. The source code seems
> incomplete, but I'm
> probably wrong. I would definitively use PetCylindricalSystem instead.
>
> Is there any special reason you are using PETScanner?
>
> Fernando
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Leo Read <leoread at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I used PETscanner + gate v6.2 and did not get coincidences with generic
> > repeater.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Fernando Rannou <
> fernando.rannou at usach.cl
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> Please specify with version of gate you are having this problem.
> >> I use repeaters and CYlindricalPET in 6.1 and I get coincidences
> >>
> >>
> >> Fernando
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Leo Read <leoread at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Antonio,
> >>>
> >>> I have also noticed that coincidences are not generated when the
> generic
> >>> repeater is used. I did not find any solution to this on the forum.
> >>>
> >>> As a result, I'm writing C code to generating coincidence data based on
> >>> hits data in the root output. I have personally found that I don't
> like how
> >>> Gate generates singles output based on the hits output - it doesn't
> seem to
> >>> handle inter-crystal events properly. If you are OK with ignoring this
> >>> effect, then you may want to look into looping over the singles data
> and
> >>> generating your own coincidence data.
> >>>
> >>> If anybody has an alternative solution, please share your thoughts.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Toninho Antonio <acbertolo at gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> We are looking to simulate PET systems and when we used the generic
> >>>> repeater to replicate the rsectors, using PETScanner or
> CYlindricalPET,
> >>>> the coincidences was not generated. Besides that when we kept the
> >>>> same digitizer and used the ring repeater the coincidences were
> generated
> >>>> correctly.
> >>>>
> >>>> Does anyone used the generic repeater and was able get the
> >>>> coincidences? Is it necessary any specific modifications on digitizer?
> >>>>
> >>>> The Singles are generated in both cases. We tried with two PET system
> >>>> at GATE to test whether the generic repeater was to be used
> specifically to
> >>>> PETScanner.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Gate-users mailing list
> >>>> Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
> >>>> http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Gate-users mailing list
> >>> Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
> >>> http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/private/gate-users/attachments/20130730/6a9cf1ec/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:11:06 -0400
> From: Leo Read <leoread at gmail.com>
> To: Fernando Rannou <fernando.rannou at usach.cl>
> Cc: "<gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org>"
> <gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org>
> Subject: Re: [Gate-users] Coincidences with generic repeater
> Message-ID:
> <CAAZkGQkVsSx2fazLn+FeA=0EwKFNqJ=
> uuE1e+YCcfpUSqYGB+g at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I was using PETscanner because I was trying to simulate a rectangular ring
> geometry. Not sure if this can be done with PetCylindricalSystem + generic
> repeater. Is there an alternate way to simulate a rectangular geometry
> while generating coincidences?
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/private/gate-users/attachments/20130730/75bbc596/attachment.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gate-users mailing list
> Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
> http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
>
> End of Gate-users Digest, Vol 86, Issue 26
> ******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/private/gate-users/attachments/20130730/c5b9ee2d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gate-users
mailing list