[Gate-users] Gate-users Digest, Vol 77, Issue 25

Kihong Son skh0619 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 30 15:28:35 CET 2012


hi everyone.

Is it possible A *CAD* Interface for *GATE simulation?*

Thank you

.
Best regards,
Kihong


2012/10/30 <gate-users-request at lists.opengatecollaboration.org>

> Send Gate-users mailing list submissions to
>         gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         gate-users-request at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         gate-users-owner at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Gate-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Physics in Geant4 and GATE (Pawe? Kowalski)
>    2. Re: Physics in Geant4 and GATE (Hermann Fuchs)
>    3. Activity ~ mAs (J?rvinen Jukka Ilari)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:05:57 +0100
> From: Pawe? Kowalski <flukson at gmail.com>
> To: gate-users <gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org>
> Subject: [Gate-users] Physics in Geant4 and GATE
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CANzsbvLLiEO+L7TD3nHYKjgxb0RP2K16u5c8MQrJu3YAChmuPQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there any difference beetwen physics and physical processes
> implemented in geant4 and in gate6? Is gate6 only an overlay over a
> geant4 to simplify simulations for tomography?
>
> Best regards,
> Pawe? Kowalski
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:58:12 +0100
> From: Hermann Fuchs <hermann.fuchs at meduniwien.ac.at>
> To: Pawe? Kowalski <flukson at gmail.com>
> Cc: gate-users <gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org>
> Subject: Re: [Gate-users] Physics in Geant4 and GATE
> Message-ID:
>         <1351511892.21599.3.camel at strahlen41.strahlen.meduniwien.ac.at>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hi
>
> Yes this is the case. Gate is basically a very nice gui for geant4.
> The basic physic processes are implemented in geant4 and wrapped for use
> in Gate.
>
> Best regards,
> Hermann
>
> On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 12:05 +0100, Pawe? Kowalski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is there any difference beetwen physics and physical processes
> > implemented in geant4 and in gate6? Is gate6 only an overlay over a
> > geant4 to simplify simulations for tomography?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Pawe? Kowalski
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gate-users mailing list
> > Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
> > http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
>
> --
> -------------
> DI Hermann Fuchs
> Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation
> Oncology
> Department of Radiation Oncology
> Medical University Vienna
> W?hringer G?rtel 18-20
> A-1090 Wien
>
> Tel.  + 43 / 1 / 40 400 7271
> Mail. hermann.fuchs at meduniwien.ac.at
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:54:03 +0200
> From: J?rvinen Jukka Ilari <Jukka.Ilari.Jarvinen at tyks.fi>
> To: <gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org>
> Subject: [Gate-users] Activity ~ mAs
> Message-ID:
>         <3DCFDD46EA8C9040AEB2989A71BBFF9801E20B0A at PANNU1.vsshp.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm interested in simulating CT-dose and have modelled my system and
> phantom (attempted to import interfile multiple times using multiple
> programs, but to no avail). Currently I'm a little bit puzzled as to how to
> correctly use activity in case of a CT.
>
> The classic example had a preset value of 350000 Bq and so far I have
> approximated my system to require activity between 10 to 100 times that. I
> also read that I can input dose in Gy in the activity. Which dose exactly
> should I input to the system? Is there a way to take into account the
> mAs-value of a CT?
>
> Best regards,
> Jukka
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/private/gate-users/attachments/20121030/3b4de3f2/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gate-users mailing list
> Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
> http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
>
> End of Gate-users Digest, Vol 77, Issue 25
> ******************************************
>



--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/private/gate-users/attachments/20121030/ac7a1fe2/attachment.html>


More information about the Gate-users mailing list