<div>hi everyone.</div><div> </div><div>Is it possible A CAD Interface for GATE simulation?</div><div> </div><div>Thank you</div><div> </div> <div>.</div><div>Best regards,</div><div>Kihong</div><div> </div><div class="gmail_quote">2012/10/30 <<a href="mailto:gate-users-request@lists.opengatecollaboration.org" target="_blank">gate-users-request@lists.opengatecollaboration.org</a>> <blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote">Send Gate-users mailing list submissions to <a href="mailto:gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org</a> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit <a href="http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users" target="_blank">http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users</a> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to <a href="mailto:gate-users-request@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">gate-users-request@lists.opengatecollaboration.org</a> You can reach the person managing the list at <a href="mailto:gate-users-owner@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">gate-users-owner@lists.opengatecollaboration.org</a> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Gate-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Physics in Geant4 and GATE (Pawe? Kowalski) 2. Re: Physics in Geant4 and GATE (Hermann Fuchs) 3. Activity ~ mAs (J?rvinen Jukka Ilari) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:05:57 +0100 From: Pawe? Kowalski <<a href="mailto:flukson@gmail.com">flukson@gmail.com</a>> To: gate-users <<a href="mailto:gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org</a>> Subject: [Gate-users] Physics in Geant4 and GATE Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:CANzsbvLLiEO%2BL7TD3nHYKjgxb0RP2K16u5c8MQrJu3YAChmuPQ@mail.gmail.com">CANzsbvLLiEO+L7TD3nHYKjgxb0RP2K16u5c8MQrJu3YAChmuPQ@mail.gmail.com</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hello, Is there any difference beetwen physics and physical processes implemented in geant4 and in gate6? Is gate6 only an overlay over a geant4 to simplify simulations for tomography? Best regards, Pawe? Kowalski ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:58:12 +0100 From: Hermann Fuchs <<a href="mailto:hermann.fuchs@meduniwien.ac.at">hermann.fuchs@meduniwien.ac.at</a>> To: Pawe? Kowalski <<a href="mailto:flukson@gmail.com">flukson@gmail.com</a>> Cc: gate-users <<a href="mailto:gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org</a>> Subject: Re: [Gate-users] Physics in Geant4 and GATE Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:1351511892.21599.3.camel@strahlen41.strahlen.meduniwien.ac.at">1351511892.21599.3.camel@strahlen41.strahlen.meduniwien.ac.at</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Yes this is the case. Gate is basically a very nice gui for geant4. The basic physic processes are implemented in geant4 and wrapped for use in Gate. Best regards, Hermann On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 12:05 +0100, Pawe? Kowalski wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any difference beetwen physics and physical processes > implemented in geant4 and in gate6? Is gate6 only an overlay over a > geant4 to simplify simulations for tomography? > > Best regards, > Pawe? Kowalski > _______________________________________________ > Gate-users mailing list > <a href="mailto:Gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">Gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org</a> > <a href="http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users" target="_blank">http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users</a> -- ------------- DI Hermann Fuchs Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology Department of Radiation Oncology Medical University Vienna W?hringer G?rtel 18-20 A-1090 Wien Tel. + 43 / 1 / 40 400 7271 Mail. <a href="mailto:hermann.fuchs@meduniwien.ac.at">hermann.fuchs@meduniwien.ac.at</a> ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:54:03 +0200 From: J?rvinen Jukka Ilari <<a href="mailto:Jukka.Ilari.Jarvinen@tyks.fi">Jukka.Ilari.Jarvinen@tyks.fi</a>> To: <<a href="mailto:gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org</a>> Subject: [Gate-users] Activity ~ mAs Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:3DCFDD46EA8C9040AEB2989A71BBFF9801E20B0A@PANNU1.vsshp.net">3DCFDD46EA8C9040AEB2989A71BBFF9801E20B0A@PANNU1.vsshp.net</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi, I'm interested in simulating CT-dose and have modelled my system and phantom (attempted to import interfile multiple times using multiple programs, but to no avail). Currently I'm a little bit puzzled as to how to correctly use activity in case of a CT. The classic example had a preset value of 350000 Bq and so far I have approximated my system to require activity between 10 to 100 times that. I also read that I can input dose in Gy in the activity. Which dose exactly should I input to the system? Is there a way to take into account the mAs-value of a CT? Best regards, Jukka -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <<a href="http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/private/gate-users/attachments/20121030/3b4de3f2/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/private/gate-users/attachments/20121030/3b4de3f2/attachment-0001.html</a>> ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Gate-users mailing list <a href="mailto:Gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">Gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org</a> <a href="http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users" target="_blank">http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users</a> End of Gate-users Digest, Vol 77, Issue 25 ****************************************** </blockquote></div> -- <div> </div>