[Gate-users] Corrigendum: My mistake in pprevious messaga: Problem running GATE and ROOT with regularMatrix argument
Javier Ors Anía
Javier.Ors at ific.uv.es
Tue Aug 24 12:21:23 CEST 2010
I can't tell you a precise answer for your displacement problems, but I
can tell you to be very careful with rotations and translations
involving regularMatrix volumes.
I see in you code that you apply a rotation to you volume, and I can
tell you that there is a bug in the code that prevents rotations and
translations being applied at all to regularMatrix volumes. Now I'm not
sure about whether this bug also affects compressedMatrix volumes, but I
think that this is not the case. So this is probably the origin of the
differences you see between using one or another type of volume. Make a
try with a big translation in one axis and you'll see what I say.
I reported this problem about one month ago and also sent a patch that
I'm using right now for it, but nobody answered, this is the link to my
message in the list archives:
http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/private/gate-users/2010-June/004328.html
El dom, 22-08-2010 a las 23:51 -0700, shahrokh nasseri escribió:
> Thank you for your help very much. I have another question.
>
> There is a perception (with me at least) that the "compressedMatrix" option
> is led to displace voxels in the geometric structure of voxellized phantom.
> Perhaps this does not happen to use "regularMatrix" option. However, I think
> that "compressedMatrix" has performed more quickly from "regularMatrix".
>
> As I mentioned in the previous message, in using "compressedMatrix" option,
> it mismatches between voxellized source and voxellized phantom in the
> spatial coordinates.
>
> Is it true that "regularMatrix" option is initialized the geometric
> structure of voxellized phantom better or more precise than "compressedMatrix"
> option?
>
> Your sincerely
> Shahrokh
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Simon Stute <gate.stute at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Then if you need visualization, no matter whether you use compressed or
> > regular.
> > When you'll finish debugging your simulation, just disable the visu and
> > switch to regular.
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:38 PM, shahrokh nasseri <
> > shahrokh.nasseri at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I must correct my mistake. After I used "regularMatrix" argument in my
> >> macro file as mentioned in the following commands, I get the error
> >> messages mentioned in previous above. But when I used
> >> "compressedMatrix" argument, I do not get any error or warning
> >> message.
> >>
> >> /gate/world/daughters/name jaszcak_phantom
> >> /gate/world/daughters/insert regularMatrix
> >> #
> >> /gate/jaszcak_phantom/geometry/insertReader interfile
> >> /gate/jaszcak_phantom/interfileReader/insertTranslator range
> >> /gate/jaszcak_phantom/interfileReader/rangeTranslator/readTable
> >> range.dat
> >> /gate/jaszcak_phantom/interfileReader/rangeTranslator/describe 1
> >> /gate/jaszcak_phantom/interfileReader/readFile rods.h33
> >> #
> >> # off center Y-axis is +0 cm
> >> /gate/jaszcak_phantom/placement/setTranslation 0 0 0 cm
> >> /gate/jaszcak_phantom/placement/setRotationAxis 0 1 0
> >> /gate/jaszcak_phantom/placement/setRotationAngle 180 deg
> >>
> >> Please guide me,
> >> Shahrokh
> >>
> >>
> _______________________________________________
> Gate-users mailing list
> Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
> http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
More information about the Gate-users
mailing list