[gate-users] WARNING message in PET simulation
Claude Comtat
comtat at ieee.org
Tue May 10 10:54:33 CEST 2005
Please see the following mail exchange.
Claude
Mar Vla wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am running a PET simulation and during the simulation I get this
> warning message several times....
>
>
>
> [GateTrajectoryNavigator::FindAnnihilationGammasTrackID] : WARNING :
> positron found and photonID vector size : 1
>
>
>
> Nothing seems to be wrong, the simulation code ends, the output seems to
> be OK...
>
*****************************************************************************
> Hi Theo and Jin
> I can confirm the remarks by Jin
>
> You get these (warning) messages when the positron has not annihilated
> before reaching the World boundary.
> This happens often when the source is in Air, as Jin suggested.
> But having the source in Air is in most cases totally unrealistic, as it
> is normally contained in some liquid or solid.
>
> I would suggest to define the source geometry (volumes and materials)
> correctly (for both liquid and container) and to position the source
> accurately in it.
>
> Due to the relatively low positron energy, most of the positrons will be
> stopped either in the liquid or in the (glass/plastic/...) container.
> Some can escape, so a few warnings are OK. in any case, the results will
> be realistic, as in the real experiment some positrons will escape as
> well.
>
> Best regards,
> -- Giovanni ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Hi Theo:
>>
>> Yes, I think to have electron range cuts would help but I doubt if the
>> simulation results would be very different. As I guess the warning means
>> that the positron is out of the camera's field of view and thus it's
>> annihilation photons would not be counted as coincidence events. But
>> they do contribute to Random and Scatter counts though. Pls correct me
>> if I am wrong.
>> My suggestion is that a few of these warnings would be OK, if you didn't
>> get tons of it, which reduces your actual activity dose.
>> Good luck and I want to hear more about this as well.
>>
>> Jin
>>
>> Mutanga Theodore wrote:
>>
>
>> >Hi Jin,
>> >I did as you suggested and I still had some warnings, maybe I have to set
>> >some electron range cuts instead ?
>> >What do you think ?
>> >Has anyone been doing measurements in air ?
>> >Theo
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > >
>
>> >>That is because of the much longer positron range in air, which is about
>> >>170 cm for F18. But the average range in water is only 0.06 cm (F18). If
>> >>you can use a small water sphere to hold your source, it may help to
>> >>stop the warning message.
>> >>
>> >>Jin
>> >>
>> >>Mutanga Theodore wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > >>
>
>> >>>Hello Gaters,
>> >>>
>> >>>I had a setup for simulating and measuring the resolution of the
>> >>>scanner,since the measurements had to be done in Air, I defined a phantom
>> >>>which is a cylinder the same size as the inner diamter of the scanner.
>> >>>
>> >>>When I set the material as Air I have this warning messages
>> >>>
>> >>>:[GateTrajectoryNavigator::FindAnnihilationGammasTrackID] WARNING :
>> >>>positron found and photonID vector size: 1
>> >>>
>> >>>I don't really know what this means but when I use Water as the medium in
>> >>>the phantom I don't get this error , how does it affect my simulation ?
>> >>>
>> >>>Cheers
>> >>>
>> >>>Theodore
>> >>>
>> >>>_______________________________________________
More information about the Gate-users
mailing list