[gate-users] Re: gate-users Digest, Vol 17, Issue 11

[Ching-Han Hsu]

Dear All,

I had similar problem when I run the program on Fedora 4 with gcc-4.0 as Dr. 
Wietholt mentioned in his previous mail. When running the PET bench mark, 
the program would use up all memory before it quits itself. However, none of 
this has been observed when the package was compiled using gcc 3.3 under 
Fedora 3. Any advise will be greatly appreciated.

Best Regards,

Chinghan
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <gate-users-request at lphe1pet1.epfl.ch>
To: <gate-users at lphe1pet1.epfl.ch>
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 6:00 PM
Subject: gate-users Digest, Vol 17, Issue 11


> Send gate-users mailing list submissions to
> gate-users at lphe1pet1.epfl.ch
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lphe1pet1.epfl.ch/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
>
> Please use the GATE's site webmaster e-mail to  reach the person
> managing the list.
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. gcc-3.4 compiler problems & spblurring (Christian Wietholt)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 16:45:05 +0800
> From: Christian Wietholt <cwietholt at nhri.org.tw>
> Subject: [gate-users] gcc-3.4 compiler problems & spblurring
> To: gate-users at lphe1pet1.epfl.ch
> Message-ID: <200508081645.05987.cwietholt at nhri.org.tw>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5
>
> Dear all,
>
> I just downloaded the latest version of GATE (2.2.0). I also got all the 
> other
> required software in the required versions. When compiling GATE on my 
> Debian
> 3.1 system using gcc-3.4 as recommended, GATE's memory usage keeps 
> increasing
> until all memory is used, and the program quites. So I compiled GATE with
> gcc-3.3, and everything seems to be working fine. Am I the only person
> experiencing this kind of problem with 2.2.0?
>
> I am not sure if this is connected, but when I run my pinhole simulation 
> with
> a point source, I would like to simulated different amount of detector 
> blurr
> using spblurring in the digitizer. After reading the data from the ASCII
> file, the spatial blurring seems to only increase in the y dimension, and 
> z
> is uneffected. I computed the standard deviation of the globalPosY and
> globalPosZ from gateSingles.dat, to verify. Same result, the standard
> deviation in globalPosY is higher than for globalPosZ. The magnitude 
> depends
> on the amount of spatial blurring.
>
> I appreciate any advice I can get.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Christian
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> gate-users mailing list
> gate-users at lphe1pet1.epfl.ch
> http://lphe1pet1.epfl.ch/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
>
> End of gate-users Digest, Vol 17, Issue 11
> ******************************************
>
>