[Gate-users] Positron range simulation - inconsistency between GATE 8.0/ 9.0 and between source types
Minh Phuong Nguyen
mipbkhn at gmail.com
Thu Nov 5 10:29:48 CET 2020
Dear GATErs,
I simulated positron ranges for several isotopes such as F-18 and I-124
with GATE. The setup was very simple with a point source at the centre of a
water environment (20-cm-radius sphere). The sphere was that large to make
sure that the positrons do not escape the water volume.
The obtained mean/max positron range from this simulation was shorter than
what I found in literature. Then I tested with different GATE versions
(8.0/ 9.0 with corresponding GEANT4 versions as stated in the GATE
documentation), and different ways of defining the source (ion, e+,
fastI124). I observed that the positron range result was not consistent
when changing these parameters (attached figures).
Looking at the range distributions (attached figures), GATE 8.0 with ion
source produced a lot of annihilations near the decay locations (range ~ 0
mm). This was not the case with GATE 9.0 and e+ or fastI124 sources.
Does anybody know:
- why positron range from GATE is shorter than in literature?
- which changes in the new GATE version makes the discrepancy in positron
range simulation result?
- what makes the difference in positron range between the ion source and
other type sources?
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Minh Phuong Nguyen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/pipermail/gate-users/attachments/20201105/59c1af2f/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: F-18 positron range.png
Type: image/png
Size: 96079 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/pipermail/gate-users/attachments/20201105/59c1af2f/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: I-124 positron range.png
Type: image/png
Size: 105244 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/pipermail/gate-users/attachments/20201105/59c1af2f/attachment-0003.png>
More information about the Gate-users
mailing list