[Gate-users] TPS Pencil Beam Source setting
张晖
zhanghui at impcas.ac.cn
Tue May 19 11:13:27 CEST 2020
Dear Jakub
I used Gate 8.2 for simulation.In GateSourceTPSPencilBeam.cc, the beam is divergent by default, and I have changed the default values on true. However, it dosen't work in my case.
#=====================================================
# BEAMS
#=====================================================
/gate/source/addSource PBS TPSPencilBeam
/gate/source/PBS/setParticleType GenericIon
/gate/source/PBS/setIonProperties 6 12 6 0
/gate/source/PBS/setTestFlag false
/gate/source/PBS/setPlan data/PlanDescriptionToGATE.txt
#/gate/source/PBS/setNotAllowedFieldID 1
#/gate/source/PBS/setNotAllowedFieldID 2
/gate/source/PBS/setFlatGenerationFlag false
/gate/source/PBS/setSpotIntensityAsNbIons true
/gate/source/PBS/setSortedSpotGenerationFlag false
/gate/source/PBS/setSigmaEnergyInMeVFlag false
/gate/source/PBS/setSourceDescriptionFile data/Source-Properties.txt
/gate/source/PBS/setBeamConvergence true
This is my part of code in main.mac file.
> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: jbaran <jakub.baran at ifj.edu.pl>
> 发送时间: 2020-05-19 16:34:13 (星期二)
> 收件人: "张晖" <zhanghui at impcas.ac.cn>
> 抄送: gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
> 主题: Re: [Gate-users] TPS Pencil Beam Source setting
>
> Dear Hui Zhang,
>
> I am not sure which version of GATE you are using but from my experience
> it seems that when you are using Pencil Beam source you are able to set
> if your beam is divergent or convergent and you are using convergent
> beam from what I see in your souce code. In case of TPS source the beam
> is divergent by default
> (https://github.com/OpenGATE/Gate/blob/develop/source/physics/src/GateSourceTPSPencilBeam.cc
> - lines: 60 and 61), for sure in GATE 8.2 and 9.0 and I pressume for all
> of GATE versions is the case but you have to check it with your version.
> In my case I just change the default values on true (lines: 60 and 61)
> and recompile GATE once again. Please let us know if it works in your
> case.
>
> All the best,
> Jakub
>
>
>
> On 2020-05-19 10:19, 张晖 wrote:
> > Dear Gate Users:
> >
> > I previously used Pencil Beam Source to simulate single-energy pencil
> > beam for carbon-ion therapy. The features of the pencil beam source
> > such as spot size, divergence and beam emittance were defined as
> > follows: 3 mm spot size in both x and y directions, 4 mrad divergence
> > and 15 mm·mrad beam emittance. The energy spread was set to 0.1% of
> > the respective energy. Except for dipole scanning magnets,vacuum pipe
> > and window, main and sub-dose monitors, a multi-strip ionization
> > chamber (IC) and a mini ridge filter were modeled in my MC
> > simulations. The source position was located before the vacuum window
> > and a water box was located at isocenter.
> >
> > #################Pencil Beam
> > Source########################################
> >
> > # SOURCE PBS
> > /gate/source/addSource C12 PencilBeam
> >
> > #particle type
> > /gate/source/C12/setParticleType GenericIon
> > /gate/source/C12/setIonProperties 6 12 6 0
> >
> > #energy spectrum
> > /gate/source/C12/setEnergy 2687.52 MeV
> > /gate/source/C12/setSigmaEnergy 2.68752 MeV
> >
> > #position
> > /gate/source/C12/setPosition 0 0 -1.4059 m
> >
> > # spot size
> > /gate/source/C12/setSigmaX 3 mm
> > /gate/source/C12/setSigmaY 3 mm
> >
> > #divergence
> > /gate/source/C12/setSigmaTheta 4 mrad
> > /gate/source/C12/setSigmaPhi 4 mrad
> >
> > #emittance
> > /gate/source/C12/setEllipseXThetaEmittance 15 mm*mrad
> > /gate/source/C12/setEllipseYPhiEmittance 15 mm*mrad
> >
> > #positive-> converging beam; negative diverging beam
> > /gate/source/C12/setEllipseXThetaRotationNorm positive
> > /gate/source/C12/setEllipseYPhiRotationNorm positive
> >
> > Now, I want to use TPS Pencil Beam Source to simulate realistic
> > treatment plan for carbon ion therapy. In Source-properties.txt file,
> > it contains 8 polynomial equations, each equation being a function of
> > the energy at the nozzle entrance.
> >
> > #################TPS Pencil Beam
> > Source-Source-properties########################################
> >
> > # Source properties
> >
> > # Nozzle exit to Isocenter distance
> > 1405.9
> > # SMX to Isocenter distance
> > 4000
> > # SMY to Isocenter distance
> > 4000
> >
> > # ENERGY
> > # mean energy
> > # polynomial order
> > 1
> > # polynomial parameters (highest to lowest)
> > 1
> > 0
> >
> > # energy spread
> > # polynomial order
> > percent
> > 1
> > # polynomial parameters (highest to lowest)
> > 0.001
> > 0
> >
> > # SPOT x y theta phi
> > # x
> > # polynomial order
> > 1
> > # polynomial parameters
> > 0
> > 3
> > # Theta
> > # polynomial order
> > 1
> > # polynomial parameters
> > 0
> > 0.004
> > # y
> > # polynomial order
> > 1
> > # polynomial parameters
> > 0
> > 3
> > # Phi
> > # polynomial order
> > 1
> > # polynomial parameters
> > 0
> > 0.004
> >
> > # SPOT emmittances
> > # x-theta emmittance
> > # polynomial order
> > 1
> > # polynomial parameters
> > 0
> > 0.015
> > # y-phi emmittance
> > # polynomial order
> > 1
> > # polynomial parameters
> > 0
> > 0.015
> >
> > #################TPS Pencil Beam
> > Source-PlanDescriptionToGate########################################
> >
> > #TREATMENT-PLAN-DESCRIPTION
> > #PlanName
> > IMPT
> > #NumberOfFractions *** CURRENTLY THIS VALUE IS NOT USED
> > ***
> > 1
> > ##FractionID *** CURRENTLY THIS VALUE IS NOT USED
> > ***
> > 1
> > ##NumberOfFields
> > 1
> > ###FieldsID
> > 1
> >
> > #TotalMetersetWeightOfAllFields *** CURRENTLY THIS VALUE IS
> > NOT USED ***
> > 662421
> >
> > #FIELD-DESCRIPTION
> > ###FieldID
> > 1
> > ###FinalCumulativeMeterSetWeight *** CURRENTLY THIS VALUE IS NOT
> > USED ***
> > 336732
> > ###GantryAngle (in degrees)
> > 0
> > ###PatientSupportAngle *** CURRENTLY THIS VALUE IS NOT
> > USED ***
> > 0
> > ###IsocenterPosition *** CURRENTLY THIS VALUE IS NOT
> > USED ***
> > 0 0 0
> > ###NumberOfControlPoints
> > 1
> >
> > #SPOTS-DESCRIPTION
> > ####ControlPointIndex
> > 0
> > ####SpotTunnedID *** CURRENTLY THIS VALUE IS NOT USED
> > ***
> > 0
> > ####CumulativeMetersetWeight *** CURRENTLY THIS VALUE IS NOT
> > USED ***
> > 0
> > ####Energy (MeV)
> > 2687.52
> > ####NbOfScannedSpots
> > 1
> > ####X Y Weight (spot position at isocenter in mm, with weight in MU
> > (default) or number of ions "setSpotIntensityAsNbIons true")
> > 0 0 100
> >
> > I simulated the same energy beam in my PlanDescriptionToGate.txt file
> > and the spot position is at isocenter. However, I find that the dose
> > distributions with these two sources in water box were different. I'm
> > puzzled about the parameter settings in TPS Pencil Beam Source if I
> > want to make them consistent with those in Pencil Beam Source
> > settings. How can I do?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Hui Zhang
> >
> > -------------------------
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gate-users mailing list
> > Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
> > http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
------------------------------
Zhang HuiUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Institute of Modern Physics
</zhanghui at impcas.ac.cn></jakub.baran at ifj.edu.pl>
More information about the Gate-users
mailing list