[Gate-users] Surfaces definition in GATE v9.0

[JAN Sebastien]

Hi Carlotta,
It was and it is not clear for me but the “trouble” is probably associated to the G4 modifications between the 10.4 and 10.5 versions (when we moved on G4 10.5 for the Gate8.2 release)…This was not really studied at that time.
Cheers
Seb
De : Gate-users <gate-users-bounces at lists.opengatecollaboration.org> De la part de Carlotta Trigila
Envoyé : mercredi 16 décembre 2020 16:32
À : Mathieu Dupont <mdupont at cppm.in2p3.fr>; 강한규 <lovehangulp at naver.com>; gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
Objet : [Gate-users] Surfaces definition in GATE v9.0

Dear GATE Users,

I am specifically addressing this e-mail to anyone using optical simulations and surface definition with GATE v9.0.

I noticed that in the last versions of GATE the definition of the surfaces for optical simulations has to be performed AFTER the "/gate/run/initialize" command.
E.g. from optical.mac benchmark example
"

/gate/run/initialize



# Definition of surfaces

/gate/detector/surfaces/name                             Detection1

/gate/detector/surfaces/insert                           Electronics

/gate/detector/surfaces/Detection1/setSurface            perfect_apd

/gate/Electronics/surfaces/name                          Detection2

/gate/Electronics/surfaces/insert                        detector

/gate/Electronics/surfaces/Detection2/setSurface         perfect_apd
"

If we move these commands BEFORE the initialization, the simulation crashes with a message like
"[G4-cerr] ***** Illegal application state </gate/detector/surfaces/insert Electronics> *****".
However, I am sure that with GATE v8.0 (and older) we were able to define them BEFORE the initialization. I am not sure of what happens with the v8.2.

Did someone ever notice it before? Did you have an idea of what could have changed?

Many thanks for your help,

Carlotta Trigila


--

Carlotta Trigila, PhD



Department of Biomedical Engineering – GBSF 2505

University of California, Davis

451 East Health Sciences Drive

Davis, CA 95616

ctrigila at ucdavis.edu <http://ccjliu@ucdavis.edu>


________________________________
From: Gate-users <gate-users-bounces at lists.opengatecollaboration.org<mailto:gate-users-bounces at lists.opengatecollaboration.org>> on behalf of Mathieu Dupont <mdupont at cppm.in2p3.fr<mailto:mdupont at cppm.in2p3.fr>>
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 2:17 AM
To: 강한규 <lovehangulp at naver.com<mailto:lovehangulp at naver.com>>
Cc: GATE-users <Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org<mailto:Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org>>
Subject: Re: [Gate-users] GATEv9.0 Scintillation Process is NOT working.(Solved)

Thx for your report,

The aim of my fix is to make scintillation working for the combination
 "GATEv9.0  (with my patch) + Geant4.10.06.p02 "

Can you test it, if you have time  ?



On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:52:32 +0900
강한규 <lovehangulp at naver.com<mailto:lovehangulp at naver.com>> wrote:

> Dear Mathieu Dupont and GATE users,
>
> After downgrading the Geant4 version from Geant4.10.06.p02 to
> Geant4.9.05.p01, the scintillation process works in GATEv9.0
> (Attached file). (Before)GATEv9.0 + Geant4.10.06.p02 -> Scintillation
> Process does NOT work. (After) GATEv9.0 + Geant4.9.05.p01 ->
> Scintillation Process does work.
> You can find issue and fix on the following links of the GATE git hub.
> Issue: https://github.com/OpenGATE/Gate/issues/346
> Fix: https://github.com/OpenGATE/Gate/pull/368
>
> Thanks Mathieu Dupont for your good advice.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Han Gyu Kang
>
>
> --------Han Gyu Kang, Ph.D, Researcher
>
> National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS)
> National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and
> Technology (QST) 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, JAPAN
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "강한규"<lovehangulp at naver.com<mailto:lovehangulp at naver.com>>
> To: "GATE-users"<Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org<mailto:Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org>>;
> Cc:
> Sent: 2020-06-08 (월) 20:20:02 (GMT+09:00)
> Subject: [Gate-users] GATEv9.0 Scintillation Process is NOT working.
>
> Dear GATE users,
>
> Is there anyone who checked the scintillation process in GATEv9.0?
>
> I installed GATEv9.0 on my Ubuntu Linux PC.
> Of course, the "GATE_USE_OPTICAL" option was turned ON during the
> installation. After GATE installation, I checked that everything
> works fine except the scintillation process.
> The optical.mac in the benchImaging folder is working well as it uses
> "opticalphoton" as a source. I checked that Cerenkov process is also
> working well.
> However, "Scintillation Process" is NOT working in GATEv9.0 optical
> simulation. If there is anyone who succeeded in scintillation process
> in GATEv9.0, please let me know.
> Best regards,
>
> Han Gyu Kang
>
> --------Han Gyu Kang, Ph.D, Researcher
>
> National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS)
> National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and
> Technology (QST) 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, JAPAN
>
>
>



--
Démobilisé contre la réforme des retraites et la LPPR
--
Mathieu Dupont - Ingénieur de Recherche
CENTRE DE PHYSIQUE DES PARTICULES DE MARSEILLE
UMR 7346 - Aix-Marseille Université - CNRS/IN2P3
163 avenue de Luminy, Case 902, F -13288 Marseille CEDEX 09
Tél.: +33 (0) 4 91 82 72 19
Site : cppm.in2p3.fr - Email : mdupont at cppm.in2p3.fr<mailto:mdupont at cppm.in2p3.fr>
_______________________________________________
Gate-users mailing list
Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org<mailto:Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org>
http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
-------------- section suivante --------------
Une pièce jointe HTML a été nettoyée...
URL: <http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/pipermail/gate-users/attachments/20201216/7e61d512/attachment-0001.html>