[Gate-users] Validating Gate counts with Spekcalc counts
Emmanuel Marfo
emmanuel.marfo at postgrad.otago.ac.nz
Mon Jul 17 10:49:35 CEST 2017
Hi GATERs,
Please, I am having some challenges here and I need help. I imported spekcalc spectrum /[keV.cm2.mAs] and got a corresponding spectrum in GATE. I, therefore, perforemd this simple calculation to validate the GATE spectrum with spekcalc. Consider sample calculation below
SpekCalc Data
The spekcalc spectrum was converted from at 1m to 0.1m before using it as source in GATE
keV #\[keV.cm2.mAs] at 0.1m
36 7.6e07
37 8.8e07
GATE
The scoring plane in GATE was box(Air) at 0.1 from source with dimension X(cm)=1,Y(cm)=1e-5, Z(cm)=1. The Y(cm) was made smaller so that we can assume cm3=cm2.
MeV probability weighting #\[MeV.cm3.incident particle] at 0.1m
0.036 5.7e-3
0.037 6.5e-3
Converting GATE units to spekcalc units
Taking 0.036 MeV
For volume conversion cm3=cm2
For MeV to keV
I obtained 5.7e-6/[keV.cm2.incident particles]
1electron=incident particles= mAs/(6.25e15)
therefore I multipled 5.7e-6 by 6.25e15
3.5812e10/[keV.cm2.mAs]
I therefore compare
keV GATE Spekcalc
36 3.5812e10/[keV.cm2.mAs] 7.6e07[keV.cm2.mAs]
I realised GATE counts appears to higher than Spekcal counts by a factor of about 1000. My initial guess is if every thing is right I shound get the same counts in GATE. Please any help is appreciated. Thanks.
Best regards,
Emmanuel Marfo
University of Otago
Student
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/pipermail/gate-users/attachments/20170717/317c64ff/attachment.html>
More information about the Gate-users
mailing list