[Gate-users] Gate query

[Alex Vergara Gil]

Dear Jim

Send me your files (7zipped) so I can see what is happening to you, I
would assist you if I can. Nevertheless I'm having troubles too with
the GATE dose report as you can see in my previous mail.

Regards
Alex

2015-01-07 8:55 GMT-05:00, O'Doherty, Jim <jim.odoherty at kcl.ac.uk>:
> Dear Alex
>
> I hope you don¹t mind my email - it seems you can run some nice examples
> of patient dosimetry using Gate, and I was wondering if you might be able
> to help me.
>
> I¹m new to Gate, and I have some trouble in running a mouse 131-I
> example that I found online. I understand how the code works, and have
> made some adjustments to run on my version of VGate, but I reach a
> segmentation violation somewhere when I get it to run. This only happens
>
> *** Break *** segmentation violation
> WARNING - Attempt to delete the physical volume store while geometry
> closed !
> WARNING - Attempt to delete the logical volume store while geometry closed
> !
>
> WARNING - Attempt to delete the solid store while geometry closed !
>
> WARNING - Attempt to delete the region store while geometry closed !
>
>
> As you can already perform these kind of simulations, do you know any
> simple trap that I have fallen into? I have checked the geometry, World
> and DoseActor conditions many times, but I cannot figure out why it is not
> running
>
> I was wondering if it would be possible that you could perhaps test my
> files (perhaps it is my VGate version?), or perhaps provide a really
> simple file that performs a simple simulation (Using CT and PET or SPECT
> data) and saves some results?
>
> Thanks and best wishes
>
> Jim O¹ Doherty
>
> ______________________
> Jim O¹ Doherty
> Medical Physicist
> PET Imaging Centre
> King¹s College London / Guy¹s and St Thomas¹ Hospital
> Westminster Bridge Road
> London SE1 7EH
>
>
>
> On 05/01/2015 13:25, "Alex Vergara Gil" <alexvergaragil at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi all!
>>
>>I have ran a patient specific SPECT-CT Study with gate and I found a
>>very significant differences between the dose calculated by deposited
>>energy algorithm (enableEdep	true) and Dose algorithm
>>(enableDose	true). The one with deposited energy is coherent with my
>>previous calculations using Convolution algorithms, anyone can explain
>>what is happening here? I attached two pictures and the same profile
>>in both of them.
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>Alex Vergara
>>Medical Physicist
>
>