[Gate-users] gate_v6.0_p01, submoduleID bug?

[Rutao Yao]

Thank you, Yuxuan!

It turned out to be a bug in my script: I had the digitizer marco before the
/gate/run/initialize command. After switching the sequence, the problem
disappeared. 

Rutao
 
716-838-5889 ext. 162
My Calendar
My Web Page

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang,Yuxuan [mailto:yuxuan.zhang at mdanderson.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 1:41 PM
> To: Rutao Yao; gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
> Subject: RE: [Gate-users] gate_v6.0_p01, submoduleID bug?
> 
> I have checked my simulation result of the Gate v6.0.p01, benchPET and I
don't
> see anything wrong. In the attachment you can see the histogram of the
> submoduleID1-submoduleID2, and the value in the x=0 is not 0.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Yuxuan
> 
> 
> From: gate-users-bounces at lists.opengatecollaboration.org [gate-users-
> bounces at lists.opengatecollaboration.org] On Behalf Of Rutao Yao
> [rutaoyao at buffalo.edu]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 1:53 PM
> To: gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
> Subject: [Gate-users] gate_v6.0_p01, submoduleID bug?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> I noticed that none of the coincident events generated using gate_v6.0_p01
had
> same submoduleID1 and submoduleID2 values, while data generated previously
> with gate_v3.0 using same scripts did not have this problem.
> 
> 
> 
> A short simulation with benchPET scripts in the gate_v6.0_p01 package
seemed
> to confirm this observation.
> 
> 
> 
> Anyone experienced similar issue?
> 
> 
> 
> Rutao
> 
> 
> 
> University at Buffalo
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gate-users mailing list
> Gate-users at lists.opengatecollaboration.org
> http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users