[gate-users] Re: Difference between v1.2.0 and v2.2.0 and the status of voxelized phantom (Youngho Seo)
Mikhail Shilov
mshilov1 at jhmi.edu
Fri Jan 27 14:41:48 CET 2006
Youngho SEO,
I think the issue with voxelized phantoms has been resolved a while ago in 2.2.0.
I've being using
/gate/world/daughters/insert parameterizedBoxMatrix
instead of
/gate/world/daughters/insert replicaMatrix
as was suggested here and it's working fine.
Mikhail A. Shilov
The Johns Hopkins University
Department of Radiology
Division of Medical Imaging Physics
Tel: (410)502-3773
Fax: 410-614-1977
mailto: mshilov1 at jhmi.edu
>>> gate-users-request at lphe1pet1.epfl.ch 01/25/06 6:00 AM >>>
Send gate-users mailing list submissions to
gate-users at lphe1pet1.epfl.ch
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lphe1pet1.epfl.ch/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
Please use the GATE's site webmaster e-mail to reach the person
managing the list.
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Digital Mini-Derenzo Phantom (Fernando Rannou)
2. Difference between v1.2.0 and v2.2.0 and the status of
voxelized phantom (Youngho Seo)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:50:24 +0000
From: Fernando Rannou <rannou at diinf.usach.cl>
Subject: Re: [gate-users] Digital Mini-Derenzo Phantom
To: GATE feedback and helpline for Users
<gate-users at lphe1pet1.epfl.ch>
Message-ID: <1138099824.5671.7.camel at elplomo.diinf.usach.cl>
Content-Type: text/plain
Hello
I wrote a little Matlab program that can generate
Derenzo-like phantoms.
Fernando
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 12:44 -0500, Ray Raylman wrote:
> Dear All
>
> Does anybody have a digital mini Derenzo phantom for GATE that they are
> willing to share?
>
> Thanks, Ray
>
> Raymond R. Raylman, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor/Vice Chair for Research
> Dept of Radiology/Box 9236
> West Virginia University
> Morgantown, WV, 26506
> Phone: 304-293-1973
> _______________________________________________
> gate-users mailing list
> gate-users at lphe1pet1.epfl.ch
> http://lphe1pet1.epfl.ch/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:26:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Youngho Seo <youngho.seo at radiology.ucsf.edu>
Subject: [gate-users] Difference between v1.2.0 and v2.2.0 and the
status of voxelized phantom
To: gate-users at lphe1pet1.epfl.ch
Message-ID:
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0601241324040.28673 at nucleon.ucsfmedicalcenter.org>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Dear All,
Can anyone tell me what is the difference that I should go for v2.2.0
instead of v1.2.0? In addition, I vaguely remember that it's not possible
to use voxelised phantom geometry in v2. I do not remember that the issue
has been resolved. Is there any update on the status?
Best,
-----------
Youngho SEO, Ph.D.
Center for Molecular and Functional Imaging
UCSF Department of Radiology
185 Berry Street, Suite 350
San Francisco, CA 94143-0946
1.415.353.9464 1.415.353.9421
email: youngho.seo at radiology.ucsf.edu
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
gate-users mailing list
gate-users at lphe1pet1.epfl.ch
http://lphe1pet1.epfl.ch/mailman/listinfo/gate-users
End of gate-users Digest, Vol 22, Issue 9
*****************************************
More information about the Gate-users
mailing list