<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Segoe UI";
        panose-1:2 11 5 2 4 2 4 2 2 3;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm;
        font-size:11.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:#0563C1;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.E-MailFormatvorlage20
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
        margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 2.0cm 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=DE link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Dear Maxime,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>thank you for your reply!<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>I tried your suggestions out: The DTVolume level changes the number of counts a little, but by far not significantly (about 0.5% more counts where I need around 50% more for low energies). I also ran with the most simple digitizer: no energy blurring, no time resolution or dead time added. I get the same results: about 0.5 % increase of counts, but no significant changes.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Do you maybe have any other ideas why I get too little counts?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Thank you!<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Kind regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Nicole<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b>Von:</b> Gate-users <gate-users-bounces@lists.opengatecollaboration.org> <b>Im Auftrag von </b>Maxime Toussaint<br><b>Gesendet:</b> Dienstag, 10. November 2020 05:18<br><b>An:</b> gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org<br><b>Betreff:</b> Re: [Gate-users] Number of counts too low<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>Greetings,<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>I have never used the deadtime module, but are you sure about your choice for the following?<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>"""<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:11.5pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:black;background:white'>/gate/digitizer/Singles/deadtime/chooseDTVolume rsector</span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:11.5pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:black;background:white'>"""</span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:11.5pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:black;background:white'>It seems to be to "low" in "geometry level" for classical scanner configuration.</span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:11.5pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:black;background:white'>If yes, did you try to simplify (e.g. remove dead time) of your digitizer to find the origin of the problem? </span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:11.5pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:black;background:white'>Bests,</span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:11.5pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:black;background:white'>Maxime Toussaint</span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><hr size=2 width="98%" align=center></div><div id=divRplyFwdMsg><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='color:black'>De :</span></b><span style='color:black'> Gate-users <<a href="mailto:gate-users-bounces@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">gate-users-bounces@lists.opengatecollaboration.org</a>> de la part de Nicole Jurjew <<a href="mailto:nicole.jurjew@gmail.com">nicole.jurjew@gmail.com</a>><br><b>Envoyé :</b> 6 novembre 2020 06:32<br><b>À :</b> <a href="mailto:gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org</a> <<a href="mailto:gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org</a>><br><b>Objet :</b> [Gate-users] Number of counts too low</span> <o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Dear Gate Users!<br><br>I am using GATE v.8.0 to model a preclinical PET system. I carried out the NEMA - NEC measurements on the real scanner and also simulated them in GATE. The curves don't look much alike. The simulation produces significantly less counts than what is detected with the real system.<br><br>I determined the number of gamma particles entering my crystal with the "Kill Tracks" Actor. (I always ran one simulation to count the Nb of tracks killed in the crystal and one where no tracks are killed to be able to calculate the Nb of prompts generated.)<br><br>An activity of 0.58 MBq inside a polyethylene cylinder results in a total number of ~21.000 counts with the digitizer settings you can see below. Number of killed gamma particles is ~855000.<br>Energy window, coincidence timing window and dead time are set to align  with specifications given by the vendor. I tried out many different digitizer settings, but none of them leads to a result close to the measurements, also not for higher activities up to 40 MBq.<br><br><br>Do you have an idea where too little counts could come from?<br><br><br>Thank you in advance!<br>Nicole Jurjew<br><br><br><br><br>### DIGITIZER ###<br><br>/gate/digitizer/Singles/insert adder<br>/gate/digitizer/Singles/insert readout<br>/gate/digitizer/Singles/readout/setPolicy TakeEnergyWinner<br>/gate/digitizer/Singles/readout/setDepth 1<br><br>/gate/digitizer/Singles/insert blurring<br>/gate/digitizer/Singles/blurring/setResolution 0.1<br>/gate/digitizer/Singles/blurring/setEnergyOfReference 511. keV<br><br>/gate/digitizer/Singles/insert thresholder<br>/gate/digitizer/Singles/thresholder/setThreshold 250.39 keV<br>/gate/digitizer/Singles/insert upholder<br>/gate/digitizer/Singles/upholder/setUphold 771.61 keV<br><br><br># C O I N C I    S O R T E R <br>/gate/digitizer/Coincidences/setWindow 7. ns<br>/gate/digitizer/Coincidences/MultiplesPolicy  takeWinnerOfGoods<br><br>/gate/digitizer/name                            delay<br>/gate/digitizer/insert                          coincidenceSorter<br>/gate/digitizer/delay/setWindow                 7. ns<br>/gate/digitizer/delay/setOffset                 20 ns<br><br><br># TIME RESOLUTION<br>/gate/digitizer/Singles/insert timeResolution<br>/gate/digitizer/Singles/timeResolution/setTimeResolution 0.5 ns <br><br><br>#   DEAD TIME<br>/gate/digitizer/Singles/insert deadtime<br>/gate/digitizer/Singles/deadtime/setDeadTime 850. ns<br>/gate/digitizer/Singles/deadtime/setMode nonparalysable<br>/gate/digitizer/Singles/deadtime/chooseDTVolume rsector<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></body></html>