<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div>Hello Sonja, others,<br><br></div>I took the liberty to add a section on the bottom here:<br><a href="http://wiki.opengatecollaboration.org/index.php/Users_Guide_V7.2:Setting_up_the_physics">http://wiki.opengatecollaboration.org/index.php/Users_Guide_V7.2:Setting_up_the_physics</a><br><br></div>I look forward to your additions! Also, at Creatis we sometimes speak about the HADRONTHERAPY lists, they sound like we should use them for hadrontherapy dose simulations. If there would a bit more documentation on them, and perhaps an update to the Geant4 recommendations list, we would have the excuse we need.<br><br></div>Cheers,<br></div>Brent<br><div><div><div><div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 08:53:10 +0200<br>
From: "Schellhammer, Sonja" <<a href="mailto:s.schellhammer@hzdr.de">s.schellhammer@hzdr.de</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">gate-users@lists.<wbr>opengatecollaboration.org</a><br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:aswin.hoffmann@hzdr.de">aswin.hoffmann@hzdr.de</a>, <a href="mailto:susanna@uow.edu.au">susanna@uow.edu.au</a><br>
Subject: Re: [Gate-users] Physics lists for proton therapy<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:web-14104443@cg1.fz-rossendorf.de">web-14104443@cg1.fz-<wbr>rossendorf.de</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8; format="flowed"<br>
<br>
Dear Brent, Loic, everyone,<br>
<br>
thanks for your answers! Yes, we're talking about physics lists for dose in proton therapy. If I remember correctly, Susanna<br>
Guatelli is responsible for HADRONTHERAPY_1 and HADRONTHERAPY_2, so I put you in cc, Susanna.<br>
<br>
I think coming up with a wiki-page about "who uses which physicslists and why", as Brent suggested, is a great idea, as there<br>
seems to be no easy consensus.<br>
What would be the next steps to do this?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Sonja<br>
<br>
<br>
Am Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:00:01 +0200 schrieb <a href="mailto:gate-users-request@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">gate-users-request@lists.<wbr>opengatecollaboration.org</a>:<br>
> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 14:32:28 +0200<br>
>From: Brent Huisman <<a href="mailto:brent.huisman@insa-lyon.fr">brent.huisman@insa-lyon.fr</a>><br>
> To: <a href="mailto:loic.grevillot@medaustron.at">loic.grevillot@medaustron.at</a><br>
> Cc: <a href="mailto:gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">gate-users@lists.<wbr>opengatecollaboration.org</a><br>
> Subject: Re: [Gate-users] Physics lists for proton therapy<br>
> Message-ID:<br>
> <<a href="mailto:CA%2BRDvtbaZ-YwgYeWpe7xEUfu7MWBehSBt5UY6crYHfF9G%2BSi-g@mail.gmail.com">CA+RDvtbaZ-<wbr>YwgYeWpe7xEUfu7MWBehSBt5UY6crY<wbr>HfF9G+Si-g@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
><br>
> Hello Loic, Sonja,<br>
><br>
> I assume you are speaking about physicslists for dose?<br>
><br>
> The Geant4 collaboration at this time recommends something else, and here<br>
> at Creatis most use QGSP_BIC_HP as far as I know. See:<br>
> <a href="http://geant4.web.cern.ch/geant4/support/proc_mod_catalog/physics_lists/useCases.shtml" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://geant4.web.cern.ch/<wbr>geant4/support/proc_mod_<wbr>catalog/physics_lists/<wbr>useCases.shtml</a><br>
><br>
> In addition, in Geant4 10 two new physicslists were introduced,<br>
> HADRONTHERAPY_1 and HADRONTHERAPY_2, the first of which is basically<br>
> QGSP_BIC_HP. I do not know who's actually tuning these lists though. See:<br>
> <a href="http://geant4.web.cern.ch/geant4/support/ReleaseNotes4.10.1.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://geant4.web.cern.ch/<wbr>geant4/support/ReleaseNotes4.<wbr>10.1.html</a><br>
><br>
> Loic, I've never heard of QBBC, why do you recommend it?<br>
><br>
> Physicslist tuning is indeed a bit opaque: not easy to know who optimizing<br>
> which lists for what. I would be very happy if we could spend a wiki-page<br>
> on it, even if it's just a list of who uses which physicslist and why.<br>
><br>
> Cheers,<br>
> Brent<br>
><br>
><br>
> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 08:13:12 +0000<br>
>> From: Grevillot Loic <<a href="mailto:loic.grevillot@medaustron.at">loic.grevillot@medaustron.at</a>><br>
>> To: "Schellhammer, Sonja" <<a href="mailto:s.schellhammer@hzdr.de">s.schellhammer@hzdr.de</a>>,<br>
>> "<a href="mailto:gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">gate-users@lists.<wbr>opengatecollaboration.org</a>"<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">gate-users@lists.<wbr>opengatecollaboration.org</a>><br>
>> Subject: Re: [Gate-users] Physics lists for proton therapy<br>
>> Message-ID:<br>
>> <<wbr>HE1PR04MB215675174A105E19BDB9F<wbr>B759E1E0@HE1PR04MB2156.eurprd<br>
>> <a href="http://04.prod.outlook.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">04.prod.outlook.com</a>><br>
>><br>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
>><br>
>> Hello,<br>
>><br>
>> New recommendations are proposed on the Gate Website (<br>
>> <a href="http://www.opengatecollaboration.org/UsersGuide" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.<wbr>opengatecollaboration.org/<wbr>UsersGuide</a>)<br>
>> Currently we are working on the validation of QBBC_EMY at MedAustron, so I<br>
>> would recommend that one. (QBBC_EMZ is very similar as well)<br>
>><br>
>> Best,<br>
>> Loïc<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> -----Original Message-----<br>
>> From: Gate-users [mailto:<a href="mailto:gate-users-bounces@lis">gate-users-bounces@lis</a><br>
>> <a href="http://ts.opengatecollaboration.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">ts.opengatecollaboration.org</a>] On Behalf Of Schellhammer, Sonja<br>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 10:07 AM<br>
>> To: <a href="mailto:gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">gate-users@lists.<wbr>opengatecollaboration.org</a><br>
>> Subject: [Gate-users] Physics lists for proton therapy<br>
>><br>
>> Dear colleagues,<br>
>><br>
>> I am currently setting up a Geant4 model of our beam and choosing the<br>
>> physics lists.<br>
>> Does anyone of you have any experience (i.e. preferably has done<br>
>> measurements) on which of the lists are currently the most<br>
>> relevant/accurate ones for proton therapy? I am aware of Jarlskog 2008,<br>
>> Grevillot 2010 and Kurosu 2014, but looking for more recent results.<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks for your input,<br>
>> Sonja Schellhammer<br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> Sonja M. Schellhammer, MSc<br>
>> Institute of Radiooncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf<br>
>> phone: +49 (0)351 458-7627, web: <a href="http://www.hzdr.de" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.hzdr.de</a> Händelallee 26, 01309<br>
>> Dresden, Germany Board of Directors: Prof. Dr. Dr. h. c. Roland Sauerbrey,<br>
>> Prof. Dr. Dr. h. c. Peter Joehnk Company Registration Number: VR 1693,<br>
>> Amtsgericht Dresden ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Subject: Digest Footer<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Gate-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gate-users@lists.opengatecollaboration.org">Gate-users@lists.<wbr>opengatecollaboration.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.opengatecollaboration.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.<wbr>opengatecollaboration.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/gate-users</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
End of Gate-users Digest, Vol 123, Issue 12<br>
******************************<wbr>*************<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>