Hi, Yes of course, you have to forget parameterizedBoxMatrix ! the regularMatrix is faster and safe, so use it ! <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Jan Mickelle V. Maratas <<a href="mailto:jmmaratas@physics.msuiit.edu.ph">jmmaratas@physics.msuiit.edu.ph</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hello, The error disappears when using regularMatrix, instead of parameterizedBoxMatrix. What's the difference in using regularMatrix and parametizedBoxMatrix? Would it be okay if I will replace the: /gate/SPECThead/daughters/insert parameterizedBoxMatrix with, /gate/SPECThead/daughters/insert regularMatrix? <div><div></div><div class="h5"></div></div></blockquote><div> yes it's ok. the difference between both is just in the code itself, there is no difference for the user, except the execution time. but I am questioning myself about why do you use a voxelized matrix as a daughter of your specthead ? if you can use analytical description of your crystals and other, you have to, it will be much faster. Cheers, Simon </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div><div class="h5"> Sincerely, Jan Mickelle V. Maratas -- ############################################################## Physics Department, MSU - Iligan Institute of Technology A. Bonifacio Avenue, 9200 Iligan City, Philippines Email: <a href="mailto:jmmaratas@gmail.com">jmmaratas@gmail.com</a>, <a href="mailto:jmmaratas@physics.msuiit.edu.ph">jmmaratas@physics.msuiit.edu.ph</a> ############################################################## > Hi, > > Please, test with the example included in this email. > Normaly, it works perfectly with the V5 version > > Let me know > Regards > Sebastien > >> Dear gaters, >> >> Greetings! >> >> I have the same problem with Dr. Ali Asghar Parach. >> I am using a voxelized Zubal medical phantom in >> GATE for dosimetry studies. If I visualize the >> phantom using OpenGL, things seem ok. However, the >> following error occurs later part of the simulation: >> >> PANIC! - G4SmartVoxelHeader::BuildNodes() >> Daughter physical volume zubalphantomVoxel_PVP >> is entirely outside mother logical volume zubalphantom_L !! >> >> I also tried using the hoffman brain, but still the error appears. >> >> I could run my codes in GATEv4.00 with no problem. >> If anyone knows where we went wrong, please help us! >> >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Jan Mickelle V. Maratas, >> -- >> ############################################################## >> Physics Department, MSU - Iligan Institute of Technology >> A. Bonifacio Avenue, 9200 Iligan City, Philippines >> Email: <a href="mailto:jmmaratas@gmail.com">jmmaratas@gmail.com</a>, >> <a href="mailto:jmmaratas@physics.msuiit.edu.ph">jmmaratas@physics.msuiit.edu.ph</a> >> ############################################################## >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gate-users mailing list >> <a href="mailto:Gate-users@lists.healthgrid.org">Gate-users@lists.healthgrid.org</a> >> <a href="http://lists.healthgrid.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users" target="_blank">http://lists.healthgrid.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users</a> >> > > _______________________________________________ Gate-users mailing list <a href="mailto:Gate-users@lists.healthgrid.org">Gate-users@lists.healthgrid.org</a> <a href="http://lists.healthgrid.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users" target="_blank">http://lists.healthgrid.org/mailman/listinfo/gate-users</a> </div></div></blockquote></div>