<html> <head> <meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 10 (filtered)"> <style>  </style> </head> <body lang=EN-AU link=blue vlink=purple> <div class=Section1> Dear All,   The Detector Lab, ANSTO, is promoting a Post-Doc position for young, motivated, enthusiastic researchers, to develop new technologies for medical physics and national security. The position is open to researchers with expertise in one or more of the following fields: radiation transport simulations, imaging solutions, dosimetry, microdosimetry, nanodosimetry, development of new radiation detectors.   The deadline for application submission is the 1st May 2009 (Sydney time).  For more information visit: <a href="https://ansto.nga.net.au/fnt_info_page.cfm?JobID=256&info_mode=new_app&MemberID=0">https://ansto.nga.net.au/fnt_info_page.cfm?JobID=256&info_mode=new_app&MemberID=0</a> or contact mark.reinhard@ansto.gov.au Postdoctoral Fellowship Radiation Transport Simulations 2-year terms + possible 1 year extension Salary range: A$66,451 (plus superannuation) ANSTO is one of Australia’s foremost scientific research and development organisations, focused on delivering the benefits of nuclear science to the Australian community.   We are seeking a fellow to work in the area of radiation transport simulations using GEANT4 to study problems in microdosimetry and related topics.  Key applications are in medical physics, reactor radiation damage and national security. The potential for commercialisation of some technology areas is also under consideration.   We are seeking a candidate with a strong innovation focus, good communication skills and a proven publication record, as well as experience and skills specific to the proposed research project.  PhDs must have been awarded within the last three years or be under examination.   For further information contact Dr Mark Reinhard – <a href="mailto:mark.reinhard@ansto.gov.au">mark.reinhard@ansto.gov.au</a>         <div> <div> Dr  Susanna Guatelli Centre for Medical Radiation Physics School of Engineering Physics University of Wollongong, NSW 2522 Australia, </div> <div> Email: <a href="mailto:susanna@uow.edu.au">susanna@uow.edu.au</a> </div> <div> Phone: +61 2 4221 4374 Fax +61-2-42214955 Phone - ANSTO: +61 2 9717 7236 </div>       Important: This transmission is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is confidential and may contain privileged information or copyright material. If you are not the intended recipient, any use or further disclosure of this communication is strictly forbidden. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify me immediately by telephone and delete all copies of this transmission as well as any attachments.   </div> -----Original Message----- From: gate-users-bounces@lists.healthgrid.org [mailto:gate-users-bounces@lists.healthgrid.org] On Behalf Of sebnem erturk Sent: Thursday, 16 April 2009 9:23 PM To: gate-users@lists.healthgrid.org Subject: [Gate-users] Energy blurring module of GATE   Hi All, I have some problems with my digitizer module. I am simulating SPECT system. And I tried two diffrent energy blurring value 0.10 and 0.268 Then I checked my root results. 2.35*sigma/mean value is ok with 0.10  I am taking 10 but for 0.268 value it gives to me 32 not 26.8 #      E N E R G Y   B L U R R I N G /gate/digitizer/Singles/insert blurring /gate/digitizer/Singles/blurring/setResolution 0.10 /gate/digitizer/Singles/blurring/setEnergyOfReference 140. keV With 0.10  I dont have any problem #      E N E R G Y   B L U R R I N G /gate/digitizer/Singles/insert blurring /gate/digitizer/Singles/blurring/setResolution 0.268 /gate/digitizer/Singles/blurring/setEnergyOfReference 140. keV But with 0.268 , I could not take 26.8  exaclt but 32. What is the problem with it? Thanks for any kind of help. Sebnem </div> </body> </html>