<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Dear All,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I'm wondering if there is any way to
turn off the attenuation in GATE (because I'd like to use a simulation
without attenuation in reconstruction). </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">What I did right now is to use "Air"
to replace "Water" (or something else) for the object material.
But I met a problem here:</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I have tested two simulations: same
objects with same activity, same scan time, but simulation 1 is made by
"Air" and simulation 2 is made by "Water". Guess what
I got? Simulation 2 (13920 counts) had more coincidences than simulation
1 (8646 counts) even if simulation 2 was supposed to be attenuated more
by water. (I attached .mac file here)</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Can anyone explain this phenomena or
guide me how to turn off the attenuation ? Should I use "Vacuum"
instead of "Air" and set up "back to back gamma source"?
</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">One more question is about the sensitivity:
what is its range for ECAT 962 system? By roughly calculating, I got 20~50
cps/kBq depending on different objects. It seems to me those number are
too high.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks a lot.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Regards,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hongwei</font>
<br>
<br>
<BR>
_____________________________________________________________________________<BR>
Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com<BR>
_____________________________________________________________________________<BR>