<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">hi All,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I have a question about the definition of the coincidence time window, which might be</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">different among the GATE society and the nuclear electronics people.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">According to the GATE user's manual, the coincidence window is the width of the single pulse,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">however, according to some literature and electronics engineering people, the coincidence windows</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">are defined as twice of the width of the single pulse. So if they say one PET camera has a </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">coincidence window of 10 ns, this should mean that the width of the single pulse is 5 ns. </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">If this is the case, then we should setup the coincidence window in GATE simulation as 5 ns </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">rather than 10 ns.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I've checked several published papers about the validation of the GATE, no one has made any comment</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">on this issue explicitly. So I brought this to you attention and hope you can give some comments.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Best regards,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Yuxuan</font>
<br>
<br>