<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hi, Dear Kris and STIR users,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I have a question about the format of 3d sinogram. When I was trying to bin my raw data into</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">a 3d sinogram, I don't know what's the exactly definition of positive and negative ring difference.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">For example, if there's a crystal pair between crystal_i and crystal_j with the axial position of z_i and z_j.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">From the raw data, I could get two combinations of the same coincidence pair as (C_i, C_j) or (C_j, C_i).</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Obviously these two type of combinations should goes to the same oblique sinogram. But how to calculate</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">the ring difference in this case? Ring difference could be either (z_i-z_j) or (z_j-z_i). Which one is correct?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">If I choose one of them, for example, z_i-z_j, and with the value of z_i=1, z_j=2, then the ring_difference = -1,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">if I choose the other, the ring_difference = +1. </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I think the difference of these two definitions are the same as switch the cells in the Michelogram between up-left corner </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">and bottom-right corner. I have tried to bin the sinogram in both way and do the reconstruction by OSEM program, </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">and the results looks almost the same. Does that mean the absolute direction of the ring difference is not important? </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">or there's something else I misunderstood?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Yuxuan</font>
<br>
<br>