<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hi, Angela Foudray,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I checked your files and I think you don't need to worry to much about the energy spectrum problem.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">We know that there are two singles in each coincidence data, let's call them s0 and s1. When Gate output</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">the coincidences data, the program should have some algorithm which decides which one should be </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">output first and which one should be the second. We don't know what's that algorithm is, but we are</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">sure it's not based on the index of the rsector. In this case we can not say that s0 and s1 should</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">have the same distribution function. So the difference of the two energy spectrum plot from</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">the output coincidences file doesn't mean anything to us. What is meaningful for us is that the spectrum</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">of each sector (or module, crystal,...) should be the same. You can do the statistics of the spectrum</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">of the two sectors by yourself from the ASCII coincidence data, and you will see the two spectrum are</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">indeed identical.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">You can check these four spectrum. Figures of coincidences1.gif and coincidences2.gif are plot with the </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">coincidences data. Sector1 and 2 are plot according to the sector number.</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Yuxuan Zhang</font>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Dr. Yuxuan ZHANG <br>
Dept. Experimental Diagnostic Imaging<br>
Univ. Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center<br>
1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 217<br>
Houston, TX 77030-4095<br>
<br>
Tel: +1-713-745-1671 <br>
Fax: +1-713-745-1672</font>