<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">hi all,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">In my simulation I noticed a strange result that I can not figure it out.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">My setup is that: using cylindricalPET system with 30 rsetors, one point</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">source at the center. The radiation activity is very high, thus there are</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">lots of random coincidences (accidental coincidences) in the totoal</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">coincidences. Now I do the statistics on these random coincidences according</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">to the sector index, then I found that the coincidences between 2 opposite rsectors </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">(e.g. No.0 and 15, or No.5 and 20) are much more than the coincidences between other</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">2 sectors ( No. 0 and 14, or No. 0 and 16 ...) Usually the difference can be 50% or 100% depend on the thickness of the detector. Is anyone else noticed that?</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Can you have a try in your computer to find out whether this is a bug of GATE or there</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">is somthing wrong with my simulation? Thank you very much.</font>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Best regards,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Yuxuan Zhang</font>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Dr. Yuxuan ZHANG <br>
Dept. Experimental Diagnostic Imaging<br>
Univ. Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center<br>
1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 217<br>
Houston, TX 77030-4095<br>
<br>
Tel: +1-713-745-1671 <br>
Fax: +1-713-745-1672</font>